I wonder if AI will be used to mass copyright thought patterns/sequences, potentially challenging people on the premise that one's thoughts are unique or an expression of identity. @Foxi4, please comment.
I doubt they can take over giants like Nintendo for example, they're the real kicker here ruining people's lives like GaryOPA and destroying their reputation for their community.
I don’t think most people’s thoughts are particularly valuable or worth cataloguing. The number of truly exceptional people coming up with unique, interesting, thought-provoking or otherwise worthwhile ideas is very limited, and those people are suppressed by their peers more so than technology. AI is not a huge threat to expression, if anything, it can be used by people to express ideas that they otherwise lack the craft to express. It’s not a huge concern to me. The world revolves around money, so “debanking”, or otherwise restricting free flow of capital will always be a bigger threat than algorithms.
I didn't mean to communicate the idea that AI was the threat. It's a very useful tool. It can also be very catalyzing, so it makes me consider how fast things can change.
I see corporate trends of buying up competition, controlling IPs, and then I see how oligarchy can stifle and manipulate speech, so I am kind of considering the synthesis and extreme expressions of that. The thoughts themselves wouldn't be the goal in this scenario, but to have as leverage against people in general.
I may try the new ram site, and download more RAM to my Switch. Not sure if ddr3 is the right ram
for it tho. Edit- no it uses floppy Ram, just like @AncientBoi